![]() Some of the key aspects of NG are its actors and the relations between them: technically, this is what constitutes a network (Elson 2015, p. The Relationships between Political Actors and Institutions As a result, the accumulating bulk of literature on NG attempts to create a more or less comprehensive picture of the phenomenon. The analytical approach to NG describes the micro-level of the network while a more comprehensive approach regards it ‘as a form of governance’ or a ‘mechanism of coordination’ (Provan & Kenis 2008, p. The perspectives on NG tend to highlight varied aspects of the phenomenon: for example, participatory models are aimed at describing the various elements of participation and deliberative ones emphasize the importance of deliberation and debates (Van Buuren et al. It is acknowledged that NG is a form of governance that is created to achieve a particular goal (Provan & Kenis 2008). The definitions presented above are relatively stable and can be formulated differently, but seem to represent more or less identical concepts (Provan & Kenis 2008, p. Aspects of Governance Key Conceptual Difficulties, Theoretical Perspectives, and Debates In general, it can be concluded that when managed properly, NG is the most beneficial choice of governance when a complex common goal needs to be achieved. Finally, there is always a chance of mismanagement and power abuse in a situation where power is involved (Bogason & Musso 2006 Provan & Kenis 2008). ![]() Similarly significant is the issue of accountability and internal and external legitimacy (Hansson & Longva 2014). The disadvantages of NG include relative instability (the downside of flexibility) and the need to balance between excessive and insufficient control (Sandström, Bodin & Crona 2015). For a business, additional advantages include the improvement of competitiveness and customer satisfaction for the politics, arguably, the democracy might benefit (Bogason & Musso 2006 Provan & Kenis 2008 Sandström, Bodin & Crona 2015). The ‘side-effects’ of NG include the empowerment of the people involved and enhanced understanding of the issues. 8) explain that the NG carried out in the Ghent region through the increasing engagement of local governments provided additional viewpoints of the people who possess more extensive knowledge about the specifics of local problems, which led to the mentioned advantages. The former incorporate the improved problem-solving and planning capabilities and enhanced flexibility, adaptability, and efficiency due to the increased number of thinkers and perspectives. ![]() The strengths of NG include those that allow it to perform its mission (achieve a common goal) and positive side effects. For example, an NG can appear business (Provan & Kenis 2008 Poocharoen & Sovacool 2012), politics (Bogason & Musso 2006 Elson 2015), or environmental protection (Sandström, Bodin & Crona 2015 Van Buuren et al. The forms of NG are numerous, and they can be related to various environments (Hansson & Longva 2014). NG can, therefore, be defined as a network that is united by the common aim of influencing varied aspects of public policies (Poocharoen & Sovacool 2012). The term ‘governance’ describes the structures, which shape the ‘rights, rules, preferences and resources that structure political outcomes’ and individuals’ actions aimed at it (Bogason & Musso 2006, p. Learn More Network Governance: The Notion DefinitionĪ network can be defined as a group of interrelated but legally autonomous units that are united by a common goal or aim (Provan & Kenis 2008, p.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |